Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 128: Line 128:     
::::::::::ASchlafly, I wasn't, and am not, going to get into the ID debate.  Others are more qualified than me to do so.  My problem is that Ed Poor claimed to have seen the movie when he hadn't, pulled a quote because he essentially claimed that a journalist at a major national new source was lying, and then banned me when I pointed out that it was the journalist's words, not mine, he was disagreeing with.  [[User:TakeTwo|TakeTwo]] 22:13, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
 
::::::::::ASchlafly, I wasn't, and am not, going to get into the ID debate.  Others are more qualified than me to do so.  My problem is that Ed Poor claimed to have seen the movie when he hadn't, pulled a quote because he essentially claimed that a journalist at a major national new source was lying, and then banned me when I pointed out that it was the journalist's words, not mine, he was disagreeing with.  [[User:TakeTwo|TakeTwo]] 22:13, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::::::: TakeTwo, the quote ''is'' nonsensical and should be deleted, and I'm not encouraged by your refusal to address why.  Instead, you launch into an attack against Ed.  Decisions can be right for the wrong reason, and your harping on a claim that the reason was wrong does not address the bigger point that the decision to remove the falsehood was right.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:25, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,597

edits

Navigation menu