2
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 131:
Line 131: +
Talk:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (view source)
Revision as of 03:05, April 18, 2008
, 03:05, April 18, 2008→Reviews
::::::::::: TakeTwo, the quote ''is'' nonsensical and should be deleted, and I'm not encouraged by your refusal to address why. Instead, you launch into an attack against Ed. Decisions can be right for the wrong reason, and your harping on a claim that the reason was wrong does not address the bigger point that the decision to remove the falsehood was right.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:25, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
::::::::::: TakeTwo, the quote ''is'' nonsensical and should be deleted, and I'm not encouraged by your refusal to address why. Instead, you launch into an attack against Ed. Decisions can be right for the wrong reason, and your harping on a claim that the reason was wrong does not address the bigger point that the decision to remove the falsehood was right.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:25, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
::::::::::::ASchalfly, I apologise profusely for the new name, but Ed blocked me again as I was trying to answer your question. Again, I point out, I am not debating ID or any of these other points- again, I'm not qualified to. I am simply saying that the reviewer has seen the film, we haven't, and he claims that Stein says this. Other reviewers ALSO say that this is what Stein says. So by denying the quote, you're denying Stein his voice, because this is, apparently, what he says. It's not a falsehood, because he's seen the movie. And I'm not talking about ID, I'm talking about Stein's argument. We're simply quoting a movie review. Can you see my point? It's not about the theory, it's about the quote. [[User:JanEngerlund|JanEngerlund]] 23:05, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
But what is the reviewer saying here?
But what is the reviewer saying here?