nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 76:
Line 76: + +
→Is this a joke?
::It looks open for editing to me. --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 11:00, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
::It looks open for editing to me. --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 11:00, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
::Remember: Citing truth that isn't "conservative enough" = vandalism. Doubleplus goodthink! --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 11:02, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
::Remember: Citing truth that isn't "conservative enough" = vandalism. Doubleplus goodthink! --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 11:02, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
*ROFL! I'll revert it back after my breakfast, or you can, Cracker. ;-) Maybe that will smoke sysop Austin out. :p --[[User:TK|TK]] 11:06, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
== Stifled the British coal and newspaper industries? ==
== Stifled the British coal and newspaper industries? ==
I thought this was Conservapedia nbot socialapedia and to claim that her fight against the unions stifled the coal and newspaper industries is nothing more than socialist propaganda. You only have to look at Rupert murdoch tom also realise it was untrue propaganda as, of course, her fight against the unions is what re-invigorated Britain, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 20:26, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
I thought this was Conservapedia nbot socialapedia and to claim that her fight against the unions stifled the coal and newspaper industries is nothing more than socialist propaganda. You only have to look at Rupert murdoch tom also realise it was untrue propaganda as, of course, her fight against the unions is what re-invigorated Britain, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 20:26, 16 March 2007 (EDT)