444
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + + + + + +
User talk:Tracy C Copeland (view source)
Revision as of 15:16, March 17, 2007
, 15:16, March 17, 2007no edit summary
:See my notes on the respective talk pages. Nowhere do I allege that Thatcher was an alcoholic; I say (with citations) that parts of the UK media ''claimed'' she was alcoholic which in turn led to her drop in popularity and the Conservative Party's decision to remove her. You reverted a lengthy article on [[John Major]] to the single line "He achieved very little", despite my - cited - source for the expanded article being the Conservative Party's own website.
:See my notes on the respective talk pages. Nowhere do I allege that Thatcher was an alcoholic; I say (with citations) that parts of the UK media ''claimed'' she was alcoholic which in turn led to her drop in popularity and the Conservative Party's decision to remove her. You reverted a lengthy article on [[John Major]] to the single line "He achieved very little", despite my - cited - source for the expanded article being the Conservative Party's own website.
:: Your article was politically biased and as regards John Major you state that the conservative party split into factions. This is untrue.--[[User:AustinM|AustinM]] 17:05, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
:: Your article was politically biased and as regards John Major you state that the conservative party split into factions. This is untrue.--[[User:AustinM|AustinM]] 17:05, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
Hi Tracy.
About your Thatcher/Blair articles.
While we may or may not share the same opinion on Margret thatcher, I certainly agree that Sysop AustinM acted very badly in removing your entire edits. If anybody is guilty of vandalism its AustinM. --[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 11:16, 17 March 2007 (EDT)