87
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: +
Talk:Old Earth Creationism (view source)
Revision as of 15:16, April 20, 2008
, 15:16, April 20, 2008→Age of the Earth: AIG says it
::::::::::Well yes, ID most certainly does argue for evidence of design - but it also argues for "evidence" of common descent and long time scales. It's all based on what they call "evidence". But isn't it wrong two out of three? Anyway, I've got to edit some more articles.[[User:Tolerance|Tolerance]] 10:58, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
::::::::::Well yes, ID most certainly does argue for evidence of design - but it also argues for "evidence" of common descent and long time scales. It's all based on what they call "evidence". But isn't it wrong two out of three? Anyway, I've got to edit some more articles.[[User:Tolerance|Tolerance]] 10:58, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
::::::::::: Where does it ''argue'' for common descent and long time scales? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:03, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
::::::::::: Where does it ''argue'' for common descent and long time scales? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:03, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
The AIG article [http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n1/intelligent-design-movement here] "Proponents of ID fail to understand that a belief in long ages for the earth formed the foundation of Darwinism.5 If God’s Word is not true concerning the age of the earth, then maybe it’s not true concerning other events of the Creation Week; and maybe God was not a necessary part of the equation for life after all." [[User:Tolerance|Tolerance]] 11:16, 20 April 2008 (EDT)