Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 368: Line 368:  
::If you're really going to try to argue that you're open to criticism, and tolerant of dissent, and opposed to censorship merely because of disagreement... well... the record is 100% against you.   
 
::If you're really going to try to argue that you're open to criticism, and tolerant of dissent, and opposed to censorship merely because of disagreement... well... the record is 100% against you.   
 
::All of this begs the question that Ben Stein asks - all people who criticize you on the site ask is that they be given a fair chance for their ideas to be heard, researched, debated, and maybe won.  What the deuce are you so afraid of?  Do you somehow know that they'll... win?-[[User:Stacw|Stacw]] 13:32, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
 
::All of this begs the question that Ben Stein asks - all people who criticize you on the site ask is that they be given a fair chance for their ideas to be heard, researched, debated, and maybe won.  What the deuce are you so afraid of?  Do you somehow know that they'll... win?-[[User:Stacw|Stacw]] 13:32, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::: Wikipedia locked the "Expelled" entry to censor insertion of balanced material.  Wikipedia welcomes edits by unregistered users ... as long the edits are [[liberal]], whereupon Wikipedia acts like it is not responsible for the smears that result.  So, yes, the biased locking policy of Wikipedia underscores how one-sided it is.
 +
 +
::: The bottom line is that the Wikipedia entry on "Expelled" is predictably and extremely biased.  No one can seriously dispute that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:55, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,936

edits

Navigation menu