Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Wikipedia chimes in: - signing my earlier comment
Line 373: Line 373:  
::: The bottom line is that the Wikipedia entry on "Expelled" is predictably and extremely biased.  No one can seriously dispute that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:55, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
 
::: The bottom line is that the Wikipedia entry on "Expelled" is predictably and extremely biased.  No one can seriously dispute that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:55, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
   −
As someone who has worked on both the Wikipedia and Conservapedia articles on this topic, I can attest that the Wikipedia article is indeed highly biased (though it is getting better, with collaborative editing), but this article has problems with bias (in the opposite direction) as well, as some editors seem to have introduced personal opinion and unsourced speculation since I last worked on the article. I'm currently trying to improve this situation. [[User:Walton One|Walton One]]
+
As someone who has worked on both the Wikipedia and Conservapedia articles on this topic, I can attest that the Wikipedia article is indeed highly biased (though it is getting better, with collaborative editing), but this article has problems with bias (in the opposite direction) as well, as some editors seem to have introduced personal opinion and unsourced speculation since I last worked on the article. I'm currently trying to improve this situation. [[User:Walton One|Walton One]] 14:05, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
120

edits

Navigation menu