Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:  
::Sure, talking about it here seems reasonable.  However, I'd worry about it being randomly deleted if things get uncomfortable.  We both know that happens.
 
::Sure, talking about it here seems reasonable.  However, I'd worry about it being randomly deleted if things get uncomfortable.  We both know that happens.
 
::Anyways, I pretty much agreed with everything the users who tried to discuss this said.  You can look [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AExpelled%3A_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=436348&oldid=436295 here].-[[User:Exfcp|Exfcp]] 17:18, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
 
::Anyways, I pretty much agreed with everything the users who tried to discuss this said.  You can look [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AExpelled%3A_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=436348&oldid=436295 here].-[[User:Exfcp|Exfcp]] 17:18, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
:::You are the "users" (user) who tried to "discuss" it.  Which was basically the liberal see how much mud you can throw and force people to try to clean it up.  Rather than ask questions, you made truth by proclamation, and went outside of the article bounds or even what was being discussed.  And it's not wise to set up the equivalent of "You wouldn't dare block me!" -- Yes we will. Now try and find something constructive to do in life.  Here, we'd like to work on an Encylopedia. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:43, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu