708
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 195:
Line 195: + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Editing article and talk pages (view source)
Revision as of 01:01, April 22, 2008
, 01:01, April 22, 2008City/town/county names?
::Mr Schlafly seems to have made his views on categorisation clear [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Explaining_myself|here]]. If it's his wish that users can't easily find articles dealing with the pernicious nature of [[liberal]]s we should respect that. Tho personally I can't see much point in producing articles that visitors are unlikely to find due to the difficulty in second-guessing the somewhat esoteric titles for use in the search box. [[User:BenHyme|BenHyme]] 07:56, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
::Mr Schlafly seems to have made his views on categorisation clear [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Explaining_myself|here]]. If it's his wish that users can't easily find articles dealing with the pernicious nature of [[liberal]]s we should respect that. Tho personally I can't see much point in producing articles that visitors are unlikely to find due to the difficulty in second-guessing the somewhat esoteric titles for use in the search box. [[User:BenHyme|BenHyme]] 07:56, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
== City/town/county names? ==
Is there currently a defined style for articles whose title is the name of a city/town/county? I'm pretty sure that currently we have articles with the following style titles: City; City, ST; City, State. It seems reasonable to bring them all under a universal style, and in my brief searching I didn't see an existing style definition. I propose that for United States locations we use City, ST (or whatever the formal name is, if not a city; examples: Andover, MA; Town of Andover, MA; Essex County, MA). If this isn't the correct place for style proposals, feel free to move it. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 21:01, 21 April 2008 (EDT)