| Line 148: |
Line 148: |
| | | | |
| | :That doesn't give you the right to be mean spirited or violate the Conservapedia Commandments. And don't be condescending enough to say that I think that Reagan is a saint. I have major problems with his deficit spending policies. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:02, 13 April 2008 (EDT) | | :That doesn't give you the right to be mean spirited or violate the Conservapedia Commandments. And don't be condescending enough to say that I think that Reagan is a saint. I have major problems with his deficit spending policies. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:02, 13 April 2008 (EDT) |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Humble apologies==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Um, hi. This is [[User:Jellyfish|Jellyfish]]. I really hate to break the guidelines like this, but I’ve created this account in order to make my case because none of the other methods (email) worked. The fact is, we’ve hit a sort of misunderstanding here. You’ve blocked me with quite a serious charge, so I guess I’d better explain myself a little. Obviously I know that keeping vandals and so on out of the wiki is very important, so I’ll deal with each of the things you stated in the block logs seperately.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 1) OK. Firstly, yes, I’ve used several IPs to edit Conservapedia. I was worried that the information on my IP address would be open to viewing by various higher editors of the site, and I wanted to retain the level of anonymity that internet users are usually entitled to. I can assure you that my use of those things doesn’t signify any disloyalty towards the site of anything like that. I was just being a little paranoid, and if you look at my edits I think you’ll see I've only ever contributed to the site in a constructive way.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 2) Secondly, I’m not Senex, whoever that might be. There doesn’t look to be any record of that user in the wiki, apart from a single (admittedly inappropriate) edit, quite recently, so I can’t really tell what similarities you saw between us. Once again, I know I’ve only been constructive here, apart from the occassional frivolous talk post.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 3) You also blocked Freeze and Tolerance for being my socks. I think Freeze was inactive to start with(?), but I feel really guity that someone as polite and generally positive as Tolerance was punished for my mistakes. If nothing else, I really think he should be allowed to appeal against his block.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | So, er, in conclusion I’d quite like to be unblocked, if it’s not too much trouble. I wasn't planning to blow the site up or anything, and I can use my own IP in future, obviously. And, also, I’m sorry to have to waste your time with this kind of unnecessary rubbish. I know you have an important job at Conservapedia.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Thanks. --Jellyfish. ([[User:SeaLion|SeaLion]] 08:15, 22 April 2008 (EDT))
| |