4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
→Disprove God?
:::In "[[Expelled]]" he hedges his bets, estimated the likelihood of no God between 50% and around 98%. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:09, 23 April 2008 (EDT)
:::In "[[Expelled]]" he hedges his bets, estimated the likelihood of no God between 50% and around 98%. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:09, 23 April 2008 (EDT)
::::That is still not the same thing as "disproving" God. The point is, Christians, apologists, and conservatives (the main group of readers for this website) read the headline for this book and say, "But you can't disprove God! Dawkins is wrong!" Dawkins knows better to say this, because of the old argument about the celestial teapot orbiting Mars (one that is there, but because of our inferior technology, we can't see it). Since Dawkins never claims to disprove God, putting that as the headline of this article is deceiving. But as Humblpi said, any attempt to change this will instantly be reverted; it's probably pointless to even have a debate over this. --[[User:AtheistJohn|AtheistJohn]] 17:08, 23 April 2008 (EDT)