1,516
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 472:
Line 472: + +
Talk:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (view source)
Revision as of 00:59, April 25, 2008
, 00:59, April 25, 2008→Scientific American
I'd rather not quote SciAm uncritically. If they want to make an argument, fine. But we needn't give it credence. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:39, 24 April 2008 (EDT)
I'd rather not quote SciAm uncritically. If they want to make an argument, fine. But we needn't give it credence. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:39, 24 April 2008 (EDT)
:Whoa, isn't the point of Expelled about the unfairness if people finding a 'scientific' viewpoint lacking in credibility suppressing its open discussion? If you want ID to be treated credibly, then why not give Scientific American's rebuttal a place in the article and let it stand or fall on it's merit? Otherwise, you wind up using the same tactics you criticize as unfair. --[[User:DinsdaleP|JC]] 20:59, 24 April 2008 (EDT)
== Liberal reception ==
== Liberal reception ==