Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 247: Line 247:  
::::I endorse Jinka's style suggestion. However, I think it should be a suggested guideline instead of a rule. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:50, 25 April 2008 (EDT)
 
::::I endorse Jinka's style suggestion. However, I think it should be a suggested guideline instead of a rule. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:50, 25 April 2008 (EDT)
 
::::: I agree on the guideline/rule distinction, whatever that means!  This will be a Manual of Style "rule".  I guess the difference is that failing to follow the Manual of Style is not (normally?) a punishable offence, but having it in the Manual of Style justifies anyone else (a sysop in this case, as only they can "rename" pages) changing the article to conform to the Manual of Style.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:12, 25 April 2008 (EDT)
 
::::: I agree on the guideline/rule distinction, whatever that means!  This will be a Manual of Style "rule".  I guess the difference is that failing to follow the Manual of Style is not (normally?) a punishable offence, but having it in the Manual of Style justifies anyone else (a sysop in this case, as only they can "rename" pages) changing the article to conform to the Manual of Style.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:12, 25 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
:::::: I agree with Philip's interpretation; see my response to Learn Together above for my thoughts on "enforcement."  Whatever we decide on, it shouldn't be a stick with which to beat users; rather, it should be a way to give a professional consistency to a subset of Conservapedia's articles. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 23:00, 25 April 2008 (EDT)
708

edits

Navigation menu