Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
rv
Line 17: Line 17:     
The atheistic counter argument has traditionally been to point 2, taking the position that the universe has always existed.  With the advent of the [[Big Bang theory]] pointing towards a starting point, this line of defense has become rather shaky.  It should also be noted that the Kalam argument removes one of the knee jerk reactions to any discussion on creation involving God which is "Then who created God?"  Since God has no beginning, the question becomes meaningless. The Bible makes clear that God exists outside of our construct of time in many locations, including 1 Corinthians 2:7, 2 Timothy 1:9, and Titus 1:2.
 
The atheistic counter argument has traditionally been to point 2, taking the position that the universe has always existed.  With the advent of the [[Big Bang theory]] pointing towards a starting point, this line of defense has become rather shaky.  It should also be noted that the Kalam argument removes one of the knee jerk reactions to any discussion on creation involving God which is "Then who created God?"  Since God has no beginning, the question becomes meaningless. The Bible makes clear that God exists outside of our construct of time in many locations, including 1 Corinthians 2:7, 2 Timothy 1:9, and Titus 1:2.
If God always existed, then why couldn't the universe have always existed? It's poor logic.
      
===[[Thomism|Thomistic]] cosmological argument===
 
===[[Thomism|Thomistic]] cosmological argument===
Line 24: Line 23:  
# The sequence of causally dependent contingent things must be finite
 
# The sequence of causally dependent contingent things must be finite
 
Conclusion: There must be a first cause in the sequence of contingent causes
 
Conclusion: There must be a first cause in the sequence of contingent causes
How do we know the universe is contingent?
      
===Leibnizian cosmological argument===
 
===Leibnizian cosmological argument===
308

edits

Navigation menu