Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
added censorship section
Line 92: Line 92:     
:The movie does not criticize Darwinists for saying the cell "arose whole" but for arguing "that life arose from a primordial sea on a lifeless planet through a chance collision of chemicals". This is the typical pro-evolution device of pretending that critics don't understand what evolution is saying. But it backfires, because the movie comes with a leader's guide which shows that Kluger is the one in error.
 
:The movie does not criticize Darwinists for saying the cell "arose whole" but for arguing "that life arose from a primordial sea on a lifeless planet through a chance collision of chemicals". This is the typical pro-evolution device of pretending that critics don't understand what evolution is saying. But it backfires, because the movie comes with a leader's guide which shows that Kluger is the one in error.
 +
 +
==Censorship==
 +
[[Liberal]] [[atheists]] have attacked the film's [[free speech]] right to be shown publicly. Among them is the animation company XVIVO, which issued a shrill legal statement demanding that part of the film be censored.<ref>http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/EXPELLED-Letter.pdf</ref> However, the group was known for trying to silence critics of [[evolution]] indoctrination.<ref>http://www.uncommondescent.com/molecular-animations/news-release-harvards-xvivo-video</ref>
 +
 +
Similarly, little-known [[liberal]] [[atheist]] [[professor]] [[PZ Myers]] attempted to disrupt an invitation-only early showing of the film, but was fortunately expelled by security officials in time; however, notorious [[atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]] was able to sneak in under a false name.<ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/science/21expelledw.html</ref> The producer graciously declined to press charges.
    
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
1

edit

Navigation menu