4,542
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + +
Conservapedia talk:Article Improvement Drive (view source)
Revision as of 21:21, March 17, 2007
, 21:21, March 17, 2007→Standardization
:About the last point... I would sort of disagree there. The sources are included in the article so people can easily check facts to make sure the article does not try to spin things. Book references are hard to verify at home, and can even be hard to verify at a library. This of course assumes that the online source is reliable in the context! If the choice is between a reliable book and a dubious site (or between an okay online source and a book that is widely regarded as The Source), we should of course prefer the book. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 17:16, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
:About the last point... I would sort of disagree there. The sources are included in the article so people can easily check facts to make sure the article does not try to spin things. Book references are hard to verify at home, and can even be hard to verify at a library. This of course assumes that the online source is reliable in the context! If the choice is between a reliable book and a dubious site (or between an okay online source and a book that is widely regarded as The Source), we should of course prefer the book. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 17:16, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
:This is being formed at [[Conservapedia:Manual of Style]]. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 17:21, 17 March 2007 (EDT)