Changes

In ''Nasir v. Morgan'', 350 F.3d 366 (3d Cir. 2003), the Court of Appeals for the [[Third Circuit]] upheld a ban on correspondence by inmates with former inmates.  The Court rejected a [[First Amendment]] challenge to that rule, noting that the ban was justified by security issues.

In '''''Nasir v. Morgan''''', 350 F.3d 366 (3d Cir. 2003), the Court of Appeals for the [[Third Circuit]] upheld a ban on correspondence by inmates with former inmates.  The Court rejected a [[First Amendment]] challenge to that rule, noting that the ban was justified by security issues.

This decision is often cited for its statement that an appellate court will uphold a district court's grant of a summary judgment motion on any basis so long as that basis was previously presented to the district court. ''Id.'' at 368.

This decision is often cited for its statement that an appellate court will uphold a district court's grant of a summary judgment motion on any basis so long as that basis was previously presented to the district court. ''Id.'' at 368.