Changes

In ''Peoples Rights Org. v. City of Columbus'', 152 F.3d 522 (6th Cir. 1998), the Court of Appeals for the [[Sixth Circuit]] considered a challenge to an Ohio [[gun control]] ordinance and rejected claims based on the [[Second Amendment]], but did invalidate portions of the ordinance based on vagueness and irrationality grounds.  The focus of the challenge was an assert right to own so-called "assault weapons."

In '''''Peoples Rights Org. v. City of Columbus''''', 152 F.3d 522 (6th Cir. 1998), the Court of Appeals for the [[Sixth Circuit]] considered a challenge to an Ohio [[gun control]] ordinance and rejected claims based on the [[Second Amendment]], but did invalidate portions of the ordinance based on vagueness and irrationality grounds.  The focus of the challenge was an assert right to own so-called "assault weapons."

The 2-1 panel held that:

The 2-1 panel held that: