360
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 117:
Line 117: + +
Debate:Grave errors/inconsistencies in the Bible make literal translation worthless. (view source)
Revision as of 04:22, May 1, 2008
, 04:22, May 1, 2008→Two accounts of creation - the Bible contradicts itself in the first chapters of the first book
How can the Bible continually remain whole and inerrant when even its most learned defenders acknowledge translation issues that obscure the original meaning?
How can the Bible continually remain whole and inerrant when even its most learned defenders acknowledge translation issues that obscure the original meaning?
In the example of Jesus' resurrection, some gospels say there's one angel present, some say two. But, is that a contradiction? No. It would be if it was said that there were only one and only two. That's a contradiction. But, one of the writers could have seen just one and wrote about that one, while another could have seen both there. It's not necessarily a contradiction.[[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 00:22, 1 May 2008 (EDT)