Reverted edits by BUPKIT (Talk); changed back to last version by Kektklik
Line 1:
Line 1:
−
In '''''Dennis v. Sparks''''', 449 U.S. 24 (1980), the [[United States Supreme Court]] allowed application of [[Section 1983]] against ''private'' parties who act in concert with a state officiNOTICE IF YOU WILL THAT THIS ARTICLE DOES NOT MENTION HOMOSINUALS IF ONLY MORE ARTICLES AND CONTENT COULD BE SUCH AS THIS WHILE DENNIS IS WHAT ONE MIGHT DEEM A QUEER NAME IT IS NOT ITSELF ABHORRANT OR MORALLY TROUBLESOMEal. Specifically, the Court applied [[Section 1983]] where the plaintiff alleged that private parties bribed a judge in order to obtain. The Court found that this could constitute [[state action]] under [[Section 1983]].
+
In '''''Dennis v. Sparks''''', 449 U.S. 24 (1980), the [[United States Supreme Court]] allowed application of [[Section 1983]] against ''private'' parties who act in concert with a state official. Specifically, the Court applied [[Section 1983]] where the plaintiff alleged that private parties bribed a judge in order to obtain. The Court found that this could constitute [[state action]] under [[Section 1983]].
Lower courts have applied to ruling to uphold [[Section 1983]] against other ''private'' parties:
Lower courts have applied to ruling to uphold [[Section 1983]] against other ''private'' parties: