166
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + + + + +
sorry, edit conflict
I'm new around here, so i don't want to stick my feet into what's obviously an old battle. But doesn't it seem like [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservative&diff=next&oldid=443810 this quote regarding the Evolution article] is the very essence of censorship on Conservapedia in action? I mean, the word "propaganda" is used, which is hardly the mission of a 'Trustworthy Encyclopedia, no? [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 18:49, 1 May 2008 (EDT)
I'm new around here, so i don't want to stick my feet into what's obviously an old battle. But doesn't it seem like [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservative&diff=next&oldid=443810 this quote regarding the Evolution article] is the very essence of censorship on Conservapedia in action?
{{QuoteBox|the article is protected to keep it a 100% anti-evolutionary propaganda article as the website leadership wants it to be a 100% anti-evolutionary propaganda article}}
I mean, the word "propaganda" is used, which is hardly the mission of a 'Trustworthy Encyclopedia, no? [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 18:49, 1 May 2008 (EDT)
I can see what you are saying, but if it's Ed Poor who put it up in the first place, and then changed his own words, I don't really think its censorship.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 18:52, 1 May 2008 (EDT)
I can see what you are saying, but if it's Ed Poor who put it up in the first place, and then changed his own words, I don't really think its censorship.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 18:52, 1 May 2008 (EDT)