166
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − + + + +
Sorry, I felt someone had to add this
Who's worse? The people who censor scientists who disagree with the prevailing theory of evolution? Or the people who falsely accuse this website of censorship when it blocks users who post false or misleading information about the censorship of those scientists?
Who's worse? The people who censor scientists who disagree with the prevailing theory of evolution? Or the people who falsely accuse this website of censorship when it blocks users who post false or misleading information about the censorship of those scientists?
==Censorship of dissenting scientists==
==Deliberate Propaganda==
An example of censorship on Conservapedia is that while one editor is responsible for 85% of the edits on the [[Theory of Evolution]] article, he [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservative&diff=next&oldid=443810 openly admits that the article is deliberately kept locked so as to maintain a piece of propaganda] in support of the website project's directives from its owners:
{{QuoteBox|"the article is protected to keep it a 100% anti-evolutionary propaganda article as the website leadership wants it to be a 100% anti-evolutionary propaganda article"}} - [[User:Conservative]]
==Censorship of dissenting scientists==
==Blocking users who accuse this website==
==Blocking users who accuse this website==