Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
221 bytes added ,  15:22, May 2, 2008
to make you happy...
Line 2: Line 2:     
:Yes, however the region you are referring to is named so BECAUSE of the river, which was there first.  The first term the reader should have definied for them in the article is that it is a river.  [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 11:20, 2 May 2008 (EDT)
 
:Yes, however the region you are referring to is named so BECAUSE of the river, which was there first.  The first term the reader should have definied for them in the article is that it is a river.  [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 11:20, 2 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::
 +
- if it keeps you happy, though the name is many, many times better known as referring to the conurbation than the river (which is given its fair whack in para 2 anyway) [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 11:22, 2 May 2008 (EDT)
3,303

edits

Navigation menu