Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 564:
Line 564: + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (view source)
Revision as of 19:47, May 2, 2008
, 19:47, May 2, 2008Is anyone going to help me write this?
I'm going to move to the end as a link, we don't need to advocate a movie.[[User:Saksjn|Saksjn]] 09:52, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
I'm going to move to the end as a link, we don't need to advocate a movie.[[User:Saksjn|Saksjn]] 09:52, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
==Controversy==
The article needs a controversy section, if we're going to tag it as "controversial" in the first sentence. What is the controversy? Is anyone saying the opposite of what the movie asserts?
Please list the 3 top sources who claim that ID is given equal time in the classroom.
Name any editor or college president who says that scientists are given complete academic freedom regarding ID throughout the English-speaking world.
It's not a controversy if the people accused of bullying and censorship issue denials. It's a controversy if there are two sides, presenting arguments. NCSE at least makes a case - even though their arguments are self-contradictory and focus on word games. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:47, 2 May 2008 (EDT)