Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 61: Line 61:     
: I am confused as to why an encyclopedia is covering ''ought'' rather than ''is''.  Typically, aren't the ''oughts'' part of blogs? Even [[Conservapedia:Commandments]] covers this: "Everything you post must be true and verifiable." and "Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry. Opinions can be posted on Talk:pages or on debate or discussion pages."  The very nature of an ''ought'' is opinion rather than fact. --[[User:Rutm|Rutm]] 16:17, 2 May 2008 (EDT)
 
: I am confused as to why an encyclopedia is covering ''ought'' rather than ''is''.  Typically, aren't the ''oughts'' part of blogs? Even [[Conservapedia:Commandments]] covers this: "Everything you post must be true and verifiable." and "Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry. Opinions can be posted on Talk:pages or on debate or discussion pages."  The very nature of an ''ought'' is opinion rather than fact. --[[User:Rutm|Rutm]] 16:17, 2 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
The article lacks description of the history of women in the military.  [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 16:38, 2 May 2008 (EDT)
5,274

edits

Navigation menu