2,851
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − +
I find the names of the parties to this case amusing.
In ''Love v. Pepersack'', 47 F.3d 120 (4th Cir. 1995), the Court of Appeals for the [[Fourth Circuit]] rejected a claim that constitutional rights were violated when state troopers denied an application for a handgun by plaintiff Ms. Love.
In '''''Love v. Pepersack''''', 47 F.3d 120 (4th Cir. 1995), the Court of Appeals for the [[Fourth Circuit]] rejected a claim that constitutional rights were violated when state troopers denied an application for a handgun by plaintiff Ms. Love.
The sweeping language of the ruling is cited by opponents of an individual [[Second Amendment]] right:
The sweeping language of the ruling is cited by opponents of an individual [[Second Amendment]] right: