Changes

:Perhaps there should be a concerted effort to create the red-linked pages in the article? As a shop-window, so to speak. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 19:44, 2 May 2008 (EDT)

:Perhaps there should be a concerted effort to create the red-linked pages in the article? As a shop-window, so to speak. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 19:44, 2 May 2008 (EDT)

::Fox, thank you for your very practical suggestion. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:22, 3 May 2008 (EDT)

::Fox, thank you for your very practical suggestion. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:22, 3 May 2008 (EDT)

::::Secondly, google has a measure how popular a webpage is through something called PageRank.  The higher your pagerank the more popular your webpage.  Conservapedia's main page has a pagerank of 5.  Eagle Forum's main page has a pagerank of 5.  The www.worldnetdaily.com  mainpage has Page rank of 7.    The NY Times website main page has a pagerank of 9.  The conservative Christian news organization that is interested in the Conservapedia atheism story has a very respectable page rank and it is better than conservapedia's main page.  Also, some Christian apologists with PHDs and websites are going to support conservapedia's atheism article.  An award winning Christian author who has multiple web sites is going to endorse conservapedia's atheism article vis a vis his websites.  A conservative organization with a website having a page rank of 4 has promised to feature conservapedia's atheism article.  There is also other things going on as well.  A christian organization who's leader spoke before the National Religious broadcasters convention and whose websites had 100,000 plus people become Christians after going to the organization's websites recently linked to conservapedia's atheism article.  I do think a good case can be made for keeping the Conservapedia atheism article the article of the month. It seems to be getting good endorsements and a case can be made that it could attract good editors of conservapedia. My gut tells me that it could become the next homosexuality/theory of evolution article in terms of web traffic that it brings to conservapedia. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:22, 3 May 2008 (EDT)

::::Secondly, google has a measure how popular a webpage is through something called PageRank.  The higher your pagerank the more popular your webpage.  Conservapedia's main page has a pagerank of 5.  Eagle Forum's main page has a pagerank of 5.  The www.worldnetdaily.com  mainpage has Page rank of 7.    The NY Times website main page has a pagerank of 9.  The conservative Christian news organization that is interested in the Conservapedia atheism story has a very respectable page rank and it is better than conservapedia's main page.  Also, some Christian apologists with PHDs and websites are going to support conservapedia's atheism article.  An award winning Christian author who has multiple web sites is going to endorse conservapedia's atheism article vis a vis his websites.  A conservative organization with a website having a page rank of 4 has promised to feature conservapedia's atheism article.  There is also other things going on as well.  For exqmple, a christian organization who's leader spoke before the National Religious broadcasters convention and whose websites had 100,000 plus people become Christians after going to the organization's websites recently linked to conservapedia's atheism article.  I do think a good case can be made for keeping the Conservapedia atheism article the article of the month. It seems to be getting good endorsements and a case can be made that it could attract good editors of conservapedia. My gut tells me that it could become the next homosexuality/theory of evolution article in terms of web traffic that it brings to conservapedia. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:22, 3 May 2008 (EDT)