Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
16 bytes removed ,  03:14, May 4, 2008
Line 40: Line 40:  
The question of causation turns on whether the characteristics of a given pattern or effect are within the capacity of the cause to which it may be attributable.  Do unintelligent material causes have the ability or capacity to account for the occurrence of a replicating cell?  Does Darwinism's unintelligent material causes, consisting of random variation and natural selection, have the capacity to account for the diversity of life once it gets started?  To start the analysis, one should first compare and contrast the capacities of intelligent causes and unintelligent material causes and the kinds of patterns those capacities produce.  
 
The question of causation turns on whether the characteristics of a given pattern or effect are within the capacity of the cause to which it may be attributable.  Do unintelligent material causes have the ability or capacity to account for the occurrence of a replicating cell?  Does Darwinism's unintelligent material causes, consisting of random variation and natural selection, have the capacity to account for the diversity of life once it gets started?  To start the analysis, one should first compare and contrast the capacities of intelligent causes and unintelligent material causes and the kinds of patterns those capacities produce.  
   −
===Capacity of Unintelligent Causes and Intelligent Design Theory===
+
===The Capacity of Unintelligent Material Causes ===
 
Unintelligent material causes consist simply of the interactions of the properties of matter, energy and the forces.  These interactions are generally governed by the laws of chemistry and physics, such as the laws of motion and thermodynamics.  These causes do not have the capacity to “know” the environment within which they exist and then seek to change it for a particular future purpose.  In other words, as stated by evolutionary biologist '''Douglas J. Futuyma''', they lack forward looking "foreknowledge. . . only an intelligent mind, one with the capacity for forethought, can have purpose.”<ref>“Darwin's immeasurably important contribution to science was to show how mechanistic causes could also explain all biological phenomena, despite their apparent evidence of design and purpose. By coupling undirected, purposeless variation to the blind, uncaring process of natural selection, Darwin made theological or spiritual explanations of the life processes superfluous. ......Darwin undid the essentialism that Western philosophy had inherited from Plato and Aristotle, and put variation in its place. He helped to replace a static conception of the world with the vision of a world of ceaseless change. Above all, his theory of random, purposeless variation acted on by blind, purposeless natural selection provided a revolutionary new kind of answer to almost all questions that begin with "Why?"  It cannot be sufficiently emphasized that before Darwin, both philosophers and people in general answered "Why?" questions by citing purpose. Only an intelligent mind, one with the capacity for forethought, can have purpose.  Thus questions like "Why do plants have flowers?" or "Why are there apple trees?"? or plagues, or storms? were answered by imagining the possible purpose that God could have had in creating them.” Douglas J. Futuyma, '''Evolutionary Biology''', Third Edition,(Sinauer Associates, Inc. 1998) p. 5, 8.</ref>   
 
Unintelligent material causes consist simply of the interactions of the properties of matter, energy and the forces.  These interactions are generally governed by the laws of chemistry and physics, such as the laws of motion and thermodynamics.  These causes do not have the capacity to “know” the environment within which they exist and then seek to change it for a particular future purpose.  In other words, as stated by evolutionary biologist '''Douglas J. Futuyma''', they lack forward looking "foreknowledge. . . only an intelligent mind, one with the capacity for forethought, can have purpose.”<ref>“Darwin's immeasurably important contribution to science was to show how mechanistic causes could also explain all biological phenomena, despite their apparent evidence of design and purpose. By coupling undirected, purposeless variation to the blind, uncaring process of natural selection, Darwin made theological or spiritual explanations of the life processes superfluous. ......Darwin undid the essentialism that Western philosophy had inherited from Plato and Aristotle, and put variation in its place. He helped to replace a static conception of the world with the vision of a world of ceaseless change. Above all, his theory of random, purposeless variation acted on by blind, purposeless natural selection provided a revolutionary new kind of answer to almost all questions that begin with "Why?"  It cannot be sufficiently emphasized that before Darwin, both philosophers and people in general answered "Why?" questions by citing purpose. Only an intelligent mind, one with the capacity for forethought, can have purpose.  Thus questions like "Why do plants have flowers?" or "Why are there apple trees?"? or plagues, or storms? were answered by imagining the possible purpose that God could have had in creating them.” Douglas J. Futuyma, '''Evolutionary Biology''', Third Edition,(Sinauer Associates, Inc. 1998) p. 5, 8.</ref>   
  
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,458

edits

Navigation menu