Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Reply
Line 10: Line 10:     
:: Conservapedia is not limited to [[liberal]] medical journals.  We are smart enough, I submit, to observe facts ourselves and let the readers draw conclusions.  We do not simply regurgitate readily available information here.  We tell the truth, even if it is censored elsewhere.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:19, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
 
:: Conservapedia is not limited to [[liberal]] medical journals.  We are smart enough, I submit, to observe facts ourselves and let the readers draw conclusions.  We do not simply regurgitate readily available information here.  We tell the truth, even if it is censored elsewhere.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:19, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Medline reports from almost all major medical journals, it does not discriminate based on political ideology. All you have done is listed a few cases and suggested that being famous and connected to Hollywood somehow increases the risk of breast cancer. You have not provided any evidence that the average age of breast cancer amongst stars is any less than the broader average. It is an unfortunate fact that young people do get breast cancer, but there is nothing to suggest that rate of young people in Hollywood being diagnosed with breast cancer is any different to the rate of young people in broader society. Until you refute this point you cannot claim that there is a mystery. [[User:StatsMsn|StatsMsn]] 23:26, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
250

edits

Navigation menu