14
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + +
Conservapedia talk:Commandments (view source)
Revision as of 22:57, March 17, 2007
, 22:57, March 17, 2007→Encyclopedic Content
:South Park has had a huge affect on American society in general, and has been praised for taking on social issues. In the last episode (a new one is on in 15 minutes), they used the N-word 43 times, to great applause. It has a huge audience. It's notable, and I suspect the only reason removal has been proposed is it's vulgarity. I mean, there needs to be a distinction between "hollywood gossip" and truly notable stuff; Lord of the Rings is notable. Harry Potter is notable. South Park is notable. When I think non-notable, I think something really, really obscure; the person who was cast as "frightened child #7" in an art-house movie a decade ago. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 00:46, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
:South Park has had a huge affect on American society in general, and has been praised for taking on social issues. In the last episode (a new one is on in 15 minutes), they used the N-word 43 times, to great applause. It has a huge audience. It's notable, and I suspect the only reason removal has been proposed is it's vulgarity. I mean, there needs to be a distinction between "hollywood gossip" and truly notable stuff; Lord of the Rings is notable. Harry Potter is notable. South Park is notable. When I think non-notable, I think something really, really obscure; the person who was cast as "frightened child #7" in an art-house movie a decade ago. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 00:46, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
*Essays by users are a nice portion of wikipedia that would be considered "unencylopedic", but I find a lot of them to be funny, informative, or useful. WP:agf (assume good faith) is a good guideline that I would consider to be an essay, and WP:assumebadfaith is an excellent joke. I like essays so much that i created a few things for this -pedia, including template:essays, [[Cp:essays]], and [[Cp:reason]]. I probably will create the essay "jews should be allowed well lit kabals" at some point, because all i ever hear about when things go wrong is "it must be a dark jewish kabal!" At least god lets us pick our friends... My point is, not all things are unfit for CP just because they are unencyclopedic! [[User:TheVoiceOfReason|TheVoiceOfReason]] 18:57, 17 March 2007 (EDT)