Changes

In ''NEA v. Finley'', 524 U.S. 569, 587-588 (1998), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that government is permitted to "allocate funding according to criteria that would be impermissible were direct regulation of speech or a criminal penalty at stake."   

In '''''NEA v. Finley''''', 524 U.S. 569, 587-588 (1998), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that government is permitted to "allocate funding according to criteria that would be impermissible were direct regulation of speech or a criminal penalty at stake."   

The Court upheld anti-pornographic restrictions on governmental funding of the arts.

The Court upheld anti-pornographic restrictions on governmental funding of the arts.

[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]