105
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20:
Line 20: + + + + +
no edit summary
:The first reference is good enough by itself, but goes beyond that and cites various sources supporting the claim. The second does state that these games lead to aggressive behavior (under the "theory" section). [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] 10:57, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
:The first reference is good enough by itself, but goes beyond that and cites various sources supporting the claim. The second does state that these games lead to aggressive behavior (under the "theory" section). [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] 10:57, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
Any chance we can work in the most prominent study saying the opposite? [http://wii.qj.net/New-research-reveals-kids-who-don-t-play-videogames-at-all-are-more-at-risk-of-violent-tendencies/pg/49/aid/118505] "If you go to the local Cineplex and see a Jackie Chan or Jet Li movie and you watch a bunch of teenagers come out of that, of course they're going to be sort of hitting each other and kicking; you know, they're excited. But that goes away very quickly.
And so there's this leap of faith that if a child or teenager or even a young adult is exposed to this and they have a short term response, then that means it's going to change their behavior. We found it to be actually quite the opposite. " [[User:IndianaJ|IndianaJ]] 12:29, 4 May 2008 (EDT)