Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
In ''Minnesota v. Carter'', 525 U.S. 83 (1998), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that the [[Fourth Amendment]] did not protect against the viewing by an outside police officer, through a drawn window blind, of the defendants' bagging cocaine in an apartment.
+
In '''''Minnesota v. Carter''''', 525 U.S. 83 (1998), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that the [[Fourth Amendment]] did not protect against the viewing by an outside police officer, through a drawn window blind, of the defendants' bagging cocaine in an apartment.
    
The Supreme Court of [[Minnesota]] had held that the officer's viewing was a search that violated respondents' [[Fourth Amendment]] rights.  Chief Justice [[William Rehnquist]], writing for a 6-3 Court, found that no violation had occurred and reversed the decision of the state court.
 
The Supreme Court of [[Minnesota]] had held that the officer's viewing was a search that violated respondents' [[Fourth Amendment]] rights.  Chief Justice [[William Rehnquist]], writing for a 6-3 Court, found that no violation had occurred and reversed the decision of the state court.
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:Fourth Amendment]]
 
[[category:Fourth Amendment]]
1,645

edits

Navigation menu