Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
21 bytes added ,  22:30, May 4, 2008
no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:  
One holding such position does not necessarily advocate a policy of confiscation to attain such a society. Part of achieving it may well be simply taking away the perks the government gives to big business.  
 
One holding such position does not necessarily advocate a policy of confiscation to attain such a society. Part of achieving it may well be simply taking away the perks the government gives to big business.  
   −
To a capitalist objection that such an ideal is contrary to free competition a Distributist might reply that competition within a regulated framework is a good thing. But if competition is unregulated a few individuals may gain the upper hand, and gain such ecconomic power as to keep other players off the field, and so, in the end, competition must not be allowed completely free reign if only in order that healthy competition may be maintained.
+
To a capitalist objection that such an ideal is contrary to free competition a Distributist might reply that competition within a well regulated framework is a good thing. But if competition is left compleatly unregulated a few individuals may gain the upper hand, and gain such ecconomic power as to keep other players off the field, and so, in the end, competition must not be allowed completely free reign if only in order that healthy competition may be maintained.
    
[[Category:Philosophy]]
 
[[Category:Philosophy]]
25

edits

Navigation menu