Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
bold
Line 1: Line 1: −
In ''Stump v. Sparkman'', 435 U.S. 349 (1978), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that [[absolute judicial immunity]] applies to protect a decision by state [[judge]] to authorize the forced [[sterilization]] of a low-IQ girl without her consent or knowledge.  She was told she was having an [[appendectomy]].
+
In '''''Stump v. Sparkman''''', 435 U.S. 349 (1978), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that [[absolute judicial immunity]] applies to protect a decision by state [[judge]] to authorize the forced [[sterilization]] of a low-IQ girl without her consent or knowledge.  She was told she was having an [[appendectomy]].
    
Justice [[Byron White]] wrote the opinion for the 5-3 Court, and was joined by Justice [[William Rehnquist]], Chief Justice [[Warren Burger]] and others.  Justices [[Lewis Powell]], [[Potter Stewart]] and [[Thurgood Marshall]] dissented.
 
Justice [[Byron White]] wrote the opinion for the 5-3 Court, and was joined by Justice [[William Rehnquist]], Chief Justice [[Warren Burger]] and others.  Justices [[Lewis Powell]], [[Potter Stewart]] and [[Thurgood Marshall]] dissented.
5,190

edits

Navigation menu