211
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: +
no edit summary
What's this section for? It does not seem encyclopedic, nor does it add anything to the piece. I think it should be deleted. [[User:PhilScheur|PhilScheur]] 14:25, 5 May 2008 (EDT)
What's this section for? It does not seem encyclopedic, nor does it add anything to the piece. I think it should be deleted. [[User:PhilScheur|PhilScheur]] 14:25, 5 May 2008 (EDT)
:Lots of encyclopedias, such as Britannica, contain assessments of famous individuals. It stays. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:09, 5 May 2008 (EDT)
:Lots of encyclopedias, such as Britannica, contain assessments of famous individuals. It stays. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:09, 5 May 2008 (EDT)
:I've never seen one, but will take your word. Are these generally understood to be editorial in nature? Should this be seen as Conservapedia's assessment of General Lee? [[User:PhilScheur|PhilScheur]] 15:15, 5 May 2008 (EDT)