Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 172: Line 172:     
The above [[liberal denial]]s are almost as interesting as the entry itself.  Observe how no one objected to "Rutm"s observation that breast cancer deaths are higher in Orange County, yet every [[liberal]] here objected to the possibility that breast cancer rates are higher among [[Hollywood]] types.  Ever here the expression "he protests too much"?  It applies with full force here.  There is nothing logical to the protests above, which merely underscores how important it is to publicize this information.  The more it is irrationally denied, the more persuasive it becomes.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:49, 6 May 2008 (EDT)
 
The above [[liberal denial]]s are almost as interesting as the entry itself.  Observe how no one objected to "Rutm"s observation that breast cancer deaths are higher in Orange County, yet every [[liberal]] here objected to the possibility that breast cancer rates are higher among [[Hollywood]] types.  Ever here the expression "he protests too much"?  It applies with full force here.  There is nothing logical to the protests above, which merely underscores how important it is to publicize this information.  The more it is irrationally denied, the more persuasive it becomes.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:49, 6 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Andy: (a) Hollywood isn't in Orange County.  LA County is below the state average, according to Rutm's link.  Even if it were higher, that says nothing about the rate in Hollywood, or among "Hollywood types".  (b) Some of the comments above may be a bit strident.  However, they raise challenges that haven't been answered.  If you want to make this case, it would be better to show your methods and to actually do the math.  The current approach is not convincing to those who understand statistics.  [[User:Murray|Murray]] 21:47, 6 May 2008 (EDT)
953

edits

Navigation menu