Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
328 bytes removed ,  22:32, May 7, 2008
→‎Tautology: rmv section, as tautology is not a type of fallacy (see Talk Page)
Line 234: Line 234:  
This is fallacious reasoning, because there is no way to know ''why'' person A believes what he does, and Person B has used one reason which suits his own purpose. For example, it's quite possible that Person A wants to cut the program because he wants to change the funding to something which he thinks does a ''better'' job at defending the country.
 
This is fallacious reasoning, because there is no way to know ''why'' person A believes what he does, and Person B has used one reason which suits his own purpose. For example, it's quite possible that Person A wants to cut the program because he wants to change the funding to something which he thinks does a ''better'' job at defending the country.
   −
===Tautology===
  −
:''Main article: [[tautology]]''
     −
A [[tautology]] ([[Greek]] '''ταυτα''' ''tauta'', "these") is an argument that becomes a repetition of a definition. Literally it means "the study of this" or "the study of these." Such an argument, or statement, can prove nothing beyond itself and is useless as a premise.
      
==Fallacies of Ambiguity==
 
==Fallacies of Ambiguity==
200

edits

Navigation menu