Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 258: Line 258:  
: That is all the more amusing when one realizes that there is a fundamental reason why [[Hollywood]] types must have higher breast cancer incidence than the general public.  Get past the symbols and look at this with an open mind, and you'll see it too.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:51, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
 
: That is all the more amusing when one realizes that there is a fundamental reason why [[Hollywood]] types must have higher breast cancer incidence than the general public.  Get past the symbols and look at this with an open mind, and you'll see it too.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:51, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
   −
::If you disagree with the methodology described above, what mathematical methodology do you intend to use?  And what is this "fundamental reason" you refer to?  [[User:StatsFan|StatsFan]] 19:54, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
+
::If you disagree with the methodology described above, what mathematical methodology do you instead propose?  And what is this "fundamental reason" you refer to?   I'm just curious as to how to prove this hypothesis.   [[User:StatsFan|StatsFan]] 19:54, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
70

edits

Navigation menu