Changes

<br>

<br>

If Z > Y, and passes the Chi Square Test, you're definitely onto something, and quite likely a large amount of funding would immediately be available for further research.  But with A, B and X as yet undefined, as here, we don't have proof yet of the trend.  But at least we have defined the numbers we are looking for, and we can continue to study your theory.  [[User:StatsFan|StatsFan]] 17:57, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

If Z > Y, and passes the Chi Square Test, you're definitely onto something, and quite likely a large amount of funding would immediately be available for further research.  But with A, B, W and X as yet undefined, as here, we don't have proof yet of the trend.  But at least we have defined the numbers we are looking for, and we can continue to study your theory.  [[User:StatsFan|StatsFan]] 17:57, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

: Your symbols add nothing here, and your conclusion that "quite likely a large amount of funding would immediately be available for further research" is absurd.  The same hysterically [[liberal]] reaction posted on this talk page by others above would great any application for funding of this hypothesis.  Such application would find the trashcan before a closed-minded recipient looked beyond its first page.

: Your symbols add nothing here, and your conclusion that "quite likely a large amount of funding would immediately be available for further research" is absurd.  The same hysterically [[liberal]] reaction posted on this talk page by others above would great any application for funding of this hypothesis.  Such application would find the trashcan before a closed-minded recipient looked beyond its first page.