Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 289: Line 289:  
::: More generally, note that if you confine yourself to well-funded studies, then you limit yourself to what the funders of those studies want for their money.  I'm interested in going outside of the narrow sphere of funded studies and looking at real-world data to draw important conclusions that no one is willing to fund and advertise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:48, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
 
::: More generally, note that if you confine yourself to well-funded studies, then you limit yourself to what the funders of those studies want for their money.  I'm interested in going outside of the narrow sphere of funded studies and looking at real-world data to draw important conclusions that no one is willing to fund and advertise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:48, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
   −
::::But ''how many'' is 'a few' no-hitters?  Quantify, quantify!    As for going straight to real-world data, that's totally fine with me - I encourage you to go beyond the regular data, and I'll help.  But wherever we get the data from, we STILL need to know two numbers:
+
::::But ''how many'' is 'a few' no-hitters?  More than three, less than three?  The answer affects whether they get into the Hall of Fame or not!    As for going straight to real-world data, that's totally fine with me - I encourage you to go beyond the regular data, and I'll help.  But wherever we get the data from, we STILL need to know two numbers:
    
::::A)  Total number of young women between 18-45 in the 'Hollywood' business globally; and
 
::::A)  Total number of young women between 18-45 in the 'Hollywood' business globally; and
70

edits

Navigation menu