nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
11,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 157:
Line 157: + +
→Richard Dawkins: reply
As I said in my edit summary, my edit was consistent with the evidence already on the talk page. It would appear that Mr Aschlafly has willfully ignored this evidence, and pressed ahead anyway - perhaps it's he who should have been blocked? I don't particularly care whether he's the site owner, the truth will out.
As I said in my edit summary, my edit was consistent with the evidence already on the talk page. It would appear that Mr Aschlafly has willfully ignored this evidence, and pressed ahead anyway - perhaps it's he who should have been blocked? I don't particularly care whether he's the site owner, the truth will out.
:You're suggesting the site owner should be blocked? That's absurd! --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>formerly Crocoite</sup>]] 12:16, 8 May 2008 (EDT)
== Latest News Article... ==
== Latest News Article... ==