Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 29: Line 29:     
:::: Folks, I've asked someone to propose a different definition of liberal bias.  My definition makes the most sense because its scale is from 0 to infinity, like the Kelvin temperature scale preferred by scientists.  No one has proposed a plausible alternative scale for liberal bias.  Based on the obvious definition, my math is correct.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:56, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::: Folks, I've asked someone to propose a different definition of liberal bias.  My definition makes the most sense because its scale is from 0 to infinity, like the Kelvin temperature scale preferred by scientists.  No one has proposed a plausible alternative scale for liberal bias.  Based on the obvious definition, my math is correct.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:56, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::: What kind of argument is this? It scales from 0 to infinity? There are many continuous monotonous functions that have an [0, infinity] range. Actually, there are infinitely many. There are even uncountably many. --[[User:Order|Order] 18 March,  14:00 (AEST)
    
::::* First, you use raw numbers of a self selected group to come to do your statistics. Any conclusion drawn from is speculative at best. A non-no in statistics 101.
 
::::* First, you use raw numbers of a self selected group to come to do your statistics. Any conclusion drawn from is speculative at best. A non-no in statistics 101.
2,002

edits

Navigation menu