234
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 59:
Line 59: + +
re:→Theistic Evolution
:: Jesus's life and [[Crucifixion]] and [[Resurrection]] make little sense without one [[Adam]] and [[Eve]], who could not have existed under any [[theory of evolution]]. What theistic evolution does is persuade people to abandon [[faith]] in [[Jesus]] without immediately realizing it. Clever, isn't it?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:26, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
:: Jesus's life and [[Crucifixion]] and [[Resurrection]] make little sense without one [[Adam]] and [[Eve]], who could not have existed under any [[theory of evolution]]. What theistic evolution does is persuade people to abandon [[faith]] in [[Jesus]] without immediately realizing it. Clever, isn't it?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:26, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
:::It is pretty clever. However, why are Adam and Eve not known symbollically instead of reality? What I mean by that is, why does it matter if they really existed because the story symbolizes a lot more than their existance, right? --[[User:Rocky|Rocky]]