8
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 387:
Line 387: + +
→Ending Debate
::: As for the insult, rather than try and figure out what I must have meant, how about reading what I said (on this page) was the reason? It wasn't for calling me ignorant, so ho hypocrisy involved.
::: As for the insult, rather than try and figure out what I must have meant, how about reading what I said (on this page) was the reason? It wasn't for calling me ignorant, so ho hypocrisy involved.
::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:05, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:05, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
:::: I'm sorry, you're correct - you did not use the term third party. However, as for the rest of your comments, you seem to be trying to frantically defend an action by you that is either false, hypocritical or both. As I said, I have no interest in continuing a discussion with someone who is that dishonest. [[User:Urushnor2|Urushnor2]] 08:03, 13 May 2008 (EDT)