Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Illiterate democrat votes: literacy and voter affiliation.
Line 17: Line 17:     
::: Murray, your cite is meaningless and you seem to be playing the "you haven't proven it yet" game again.  Pull up some meaningful illiteracy data and we can both take a look, and I doubt either of us will be surprised by its implications for party support.  A scan of the internet reveals independent observations that illiterate voters tend to vote Democratic.  Indeed, no one seems to seriously doubt it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:22, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
 
::: Murray, your cite is meaningless and you seem to be playing the "you haven't proven it yet" game again.  Pull up some meaningful illiteracy data and we can both take a look, and I doubt either of us will be surprised by its implications for party support.  A scan of the internet reveals independent observations that illiterate voters tend to vote Democratic.  Indeed, no one seems to seriously doubt it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:22, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::: Does http://www.ccsu.edu/AMLC06/Political_Literacy.htm work for meaningful data?  You can also examine the methodology of the study (something very useful in making any claim).  On the other hand, you are making the claim above and as I understand it, "the burden is on the person who makes the claim that something happened to support."[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Wikipedia&diff=291546&oldid=291536] --[[User:Rutm|Rutm]] 13:59, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
    
== UK ==
 
== UK ==
181

edits

Navigation menu