4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: +
→Uneditable??
:::Specifically at issue is what sort of evidence can be accepted to prove or disprove ID's thesis - or for that matter, the naturalistic theory of evolution. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:44, 12 February 2008 (EST)
:::Specifically at issue is what sort of evidence can be accepted to prove or disprove ID's thesis - or for that matter, the naturalistic theory of evolution. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:44, 12 February 2008 (EST)
::::But would you say that anything under the "Evidence" section of this article qualifies as evidence? --[[User:MichaelK|MichaelK]] 20:40, 12 February 2008 (EST)
::::But would you say that anything under the "Evidence" section of this article qualifies as evidence? --[[User:MichaelK|MichaelK]] 20:40, 12 February 2008 (EST)
:::::Don't ask for his opinions, Ed's thoughts do not count, he is not an academic (whatever that means). However, it would be too much to ask to allow people to edit the page to put in the words of noted academics (???) to let their words point out how ridiculously foolish the evidence section is.--[[User:Harrypanda|Harrypanda]] 19:02, 14 May 2008 (EDT)
== Evidence --> Support ==
== Evidence --> Support ==