Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: +
Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District (view source)
Revision as of 02:28, May 16, 2008
, 02:28, May 16, 2008vet for bias - article is very one-sided
{{bias}}
'''''Tammy Kitzmiller, et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al.,''''' Case # 04cv2688, was a challenge brought in the United States federal court against a public school that required teachers to present intelligent design as an alternative to evolution as an explanation of the origins of life. The plaintiffs successfully argued that intelligent design is a form of creationism and the school's policy violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and the Lemon Test. <ref> http://www2.ncseweb.org/kvd/all_legal/2005-12-20_Kitzmiller_decision.pdf </ref> <ref> http://www.nsba.org/site/view.asp?CID=438&DID=37548 </ref>
'''''Tammy Kitzmiller, et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al.,''''' Case # 04cv2688, was a challenge brought in the United States federal court against a public school that required teachers to present intelligent design as an alternative to evolution as an explanation of the origins of life. The plaintiffs successfully argued that intelligent design is a form of creationism and the school's policy violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and the Lemon Test. <ref> http://www2.ncseweb.org/kvd/all_legal/2005-12-20_Kitzmiller_decision.pdf </ref> <ref> http://www.nsba.org/site/view.asp?CID=438&DID=37548 </ref>