nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: − +
→"Role" of the Wife?: clarify
:The result of this "role" contribution was a lengthy blog attack on Conservapedia. The blogger ignored the reverts by senior sysops and took Bugler's idea as representing the project. [http://totaldrek.blogspot.com/2008/05/study-in-gender.html] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:39, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
:The result of this "role" contribution was a lengthy blog attack on Conservapedia. The blogger ignored the reverts by senior sysops and took Bugler's idea as representing the project. [http://totaldrek.blogspot.com/2008/05/study-in-gender.html] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:39, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
:: That's incorrect. He says "...the version of the article that is so at odds with what I think is not the current version. '''This is arguably to Conservapedia's credit and I'm not condemning them''' because a previous version of the article was so bizarre." (my emphasis). So he was not attacking us for the idea that Bugler put in. Rather, he was (scurrilously) using that as a launching pad for his ''actual'' criticism, trying to denigrate Conservapedia on the grounds that "...for "husband" there were two edits over a span of months while for "wife" there were seventeen edits in four ''days''." (emphasis his). He was trying to find fault with Conservapedia based on the relative number of edits! Talk about clutching at straws! [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:23, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
:: That's incorrect. He says "...the version of the article that is so at odds with what I think is not the current version. '''This is arguably to Conservapedia's credit and I'm not condemning them''' because a previous version of the article was so bizarre." (my emphasis). So he was not attacking us for the idea that Bugler put in. Rather, he was (scurrilously) using that as a launching pad for his ''actual'' criticism, trying to denigrate Conservapedia on the grounds that "...for "husband" there were two edits over a span of months while for "wife" there were seventeen edits in four ''days''." (emphasis his). He was trying to invent fault with Conservapedia ("...if there's this much interest in controlling the representation of women on a wiki site, how much control are women subject to in their day-to-day lives?") based on the relative number of edits! Talk about clutching at straws! [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:23, 15 May 2008 (EDT)