121
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 41:
Line 41: + + + +
Debate:Why is there something rather than nothing? (view source)
Revision as of 19:53, May 16, 2008
, 19:53, May 16, 2008→Why Not?
::"No, what you've been is ''not'' on boats..."
::"No, what you've been is ''not'' on boats..."
[[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 00:06, 12 November 2007 (EST)
[[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 00:06, 12 November 2007 (EST)
== Yes ==
There is no concrete proof that there is something, everything here ''could'' not exist. We assume that there is something from the unproved axiom "I think, therefore I am." Axioms by definition cannot be proven true or false, there just assumptions. --[[User:Capercorn]] <small> [[User Talk:Capercorn|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Capercorn|contribs]] </small> 15:53, 16 May 2008 (EDT)